The campaign for Los Angeles County District Attorney is already getting fiercer with candidacies of incumbent George Gascón and challenger Nathan Hochman held a debate, which could be the best time to showcase their stances. The debate, the third meeting between the two, featured many personal attacks and attempts to explain their strategies for the further reform of the criminal justice of the Los Angeles County.
Sheriff-elect Gascón, who has had to defend himself against critics due to his liberal measures while serving as the district attorney, was on the recall defense for most of the debate. The incumbent DA wanted to campaign for a clean break from the criminal justice system and shed emphasis on reforms designed to decrease correctional populations and overlook system bias.
Hochman, who has polled well ahead of his rival, a former federal prosecutor turned defense attorney, up to now has taken a combative approach during the debate. He questioned the appropriateness of Gascón’s policies, which he said are contributing to the rise in crime rates with a corresponding decline in public order. Hochman tried to convey that he supports the idea of a middle ground, which he says he would implement for the purpose of further reforms and a decreased crime rate.
The issues discussed during the debate were the major topics of Concern, particularly within Los Angeles County, were crime rates, homelessness, as well as the opioid issue. Gascón reiterated that he has reduced the recidivism rates and applied measures aimed at fighting racial bias in prosecutions. He claimed that his policies are to build sustainable practices to deal with multifaceted societal issues as opposed to merely drowning individuals in punitive consequences.
Hochman, on the other hand, commanded the electorate to prepare for an uncompromising battle against crime, although he also noted the necessity of definite reforms in this sphere. In turn, he accused Gascón of having propagated wrong policies when it comes to certain offenses and of making criminals feel even more protected than before, while victims are left on their own.
In the debate, the two candidates also discussed two philosophies regarding the position of the District Attorney. In this case, Gascón argued that the DA should not only seek cases to prosecute to court but be an agent of change that seeks to reform society by focusing on the causes of crime. Hochman responded that the job of the office is to protect the public and enforce the law, but the office also does its best to conduct meaningful reform where necessary.
The tension was possibly palpable when questioning Gascón concerning his coverage as well as functioning of cash bail. The incumbent vowed that his policy has been instrumental in cutting down the number of people who are incarcerated merely because they cannot pay the cashier amount. Hochman has been particularly keen on this policy arguing that it has let out criminals who re offend in other incidences.
The candidates also bitterly disagreed about how they would tackle the two major social ills: gang violence and gun crimes. Gascón also pointed out that his office has been teaching the most dangerous individuals and providing diversion programs for others. Hochman vowed to prosecute gang-associated offenses more harshly and to enforce the anti-gun law much better.
The debate that was witnessed was indicative of a more general national conversation about criminal justice reform, and safety in general. In general, Los Angeles is considered one of the most important models for pressing criminal justice issues due to its huge size and great diversification.
As usual, people had different perceptions of the debate, the camp of the two candidates.MINORITY POSITIONThroughout the exercise I have presented above, the arguments that support the minority position are as follows: Political commentators minored the pollsters and showed that Gascón was at a disadvantage given the recent polls, but he did well in presenting his agenda and responding to Hochman’s accusations.
The race has drawn focus both locally and nationally and lots of cash has been funneled to both campaigns. Trade associations, police associations, district attorneys, criminal justice reform advocates and many others have vested interest in what is now emerging as one of the most hotly contested DA races in the country.
As it approaches the period of voting both the candidates are expected to up their campaign. The results of this race could decide the future of criminal justice policy not only in Los Angeles County but in California, and possibly across the United States.
The debate also highlighted that RV/SEEV voters in Los Angeles County are being offered a choice between candidates with starkly different political beliefs. In one corner, we have Gascón, who promises change, betterment of the criminal justice framework, and reforming convicts. On the other hand, Hochman thinks from a more traditional perspective, where the prosecution and public safety issues dominate.
In the last phase of the campaigning both candidates will be in full efforts to persuade the still-voting citizens, who have not backed them up earlier. In the end it will be up to the voters of Los Angeles County to determine which of these do they want in their criminal justice system.
Akin to many other races in the United States, the Los Angeles County District Attorney continues to be one of the most interesting and important electoral battle in the year. Everyone will wait to here the outcome of the elections to determine which vision of criminal justice will get a chance in one of the countries most influential places, Los Angeles.
Leave a Reply